Curated Teaching Evaluation Initiative Repository
Submit a Teaching Evaluation Change Initiative » Submit Feedback About the Repository »
The Teaching Evaluation Change Initiatives repository serves as a searchable collection of teaching evaluations, which are assessed on how well they are aligned with systemic change. Teaching initiatives are reviewed regularly by the Repository Editorial Board. For more information on the editorial process, refer to the Teaching Evaluation Change Initiatives Guide.
Audience
- College/university staff 8 matches
- Teaching center staff 9 matches
- Departmental leaders 9 matches
- Graduate students & postdoctoral fellows 5 matches
- Undergraduate students 1 match
- Student leaders 2 matches
- Change leaders 4 matches
- Faculty with long-term appointments 9 matches Tenure track, non-tenure track
- Faculty with short-term appointments 9 matches Non-tenure track, part-time, adjunct
- Institution administration 9 matches
- Institutional awards committees 3 matches
- Researchers 2 matches
Level of Intervention
Primary Teaching and Learing Context
Framework Emphasis
Tools/Materials for Evaluation
Research-Based Pedagogies
Institution Type
Scale of Change
Resource Type
Processes for Revising Teaching EvaluationResults 1 - 9 of 9 matches
University of Michigan/Center for Research on Learning and Teaching (CRLT)/Evaluation of Teaching
CRLT provides extensive information resources about ways to assess teaching effectiveness beyond student ratings, and provides consulting services to faculty and to Chairs and faculty committees.
Teaching Effectiveness Framework (TEF) Toolkit
The Teaching Effectiveness Framework (TEF) Toolkit developed by the Institute for Learning and Teaching (TILT) at Colorado State University is grounded in the scholarship of teaching and learning. The toolkit ...
Teaching Quality Framework Initiative
The Teaching Quality Framework (TQF) initiative facilitates departmental and campus-wide efforts to provide a richer evaluation of teaching. Through enhanced evaluations, we promote and value high quality teaching, ...
Teaching Evaluation Guidelines - Michigan State University (MSU)
The College of Natural Sciences at Michigan State University provides a broad framework of guidelines for departments to adapt and use for promotion and tenure decisions. The subsection on teaching evaluation ...
USC Excellence in Teaching Initiative
Peer review will be based on classroom observation, and review of course materials, course design and assignments. Peer evaluators also will consider teaching reflection statements and inclusive practices.
Continuous Improvement and Evaluation of Teaching (CIET) - University of Oregon
Led by the University Senate and Office of the Provost, University of Oregon's framework for the Continuous Improvement and Evaluation of Teaching (CIET) aims to more transparently evaluate teaching with 1) a ...
Center for Teaching Innovation (CTI) - Cornell University
CTI provides information and resources for faculty members to document their teaching and provides consultations to departments/colleges using peer review of teaching as part of promotion and/or tenure review. ...
Peer Review of Teaching Protocol, University of Arizona
Documentation for promotion and tenure requires a teaching portfolio and peer review evaluations. In response, the OIA developed an interactive, online protocol that can be used for peer review of teaching.
Observation Protocol for Active Learning (OPAL) - Washington University in St. Louis
The Observation Protocol for Active Learning (OPAL) can be used to collect research data, and also to consult and collaborate with STEM faculty to provide feedback on, and support for, their teaching innovations. ...