Teaching Evaluation Change Initiatives in Higher Education
Submit a Teaching Evaluation Change Initiative »
Audience
- College/university staff 15 matches
- Teaching center staff 17 matches
- Departmental leaders 17 matches
- Graduate students & postdoctoral fellows 9 matches
- Undergraduate students 5 matches
- Student leaders 5 matches
- Change leaders 12 matches
- Faculty with long-term appointments 16 matches Tenure track, non-tenure track
- Faculty with short-term appointments 14 matches Non-tenure track, part-time, adjunct
- Institution administration 16 matches
- Institutional awards committees 7 matches
- Researchers 8 matches
Level of Intervention
Primary Teaching and Learing Context
Framework Emphasis
Tools/Materials for Evaluation
Processes for Revising Teaching Evaluation
Research-Based Pedagogies
Institution Type
- Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) 3 matches
- Historically Black College or University (HBCU) 1 match
- Tribal College or University (TCU) 1 match
- Minority Serving Institution (MSI) 1 match
- R1 14 matches
- R2 3 matches
- Public 10 matches
- Private 5 matches
- 2-year 3 matches
- 4-year 4 matches
- Masters comprehensive 2 matches
- T1 (scholarly teaching-focused institution) 3 matches
- Commuter 2 matches
Scale of Change
Resource Type
Results 1 - 10 of 17 matches
Excellence in Teaching Initiative
Peer review will be based on classroom observation, and review of course materials, course design and assignments. Peer evaluators also will consider teaching reflection statements and inclusive practices.
University of Michigan/Center for Research on Learning and Teaching (CRLT)/Evaluation of Teaching
CRLT provides extensive information resources about ways to assess teaching effectiveness beyond student ratings, and provides consulting services to faculty and to Chairs and faculty committees.
The Career Framework for University Teaching
The Career Framework for University Teaching is designed to guide and support the career progression of academics on the basis of their contribution to teaching and learning. Offering both a structured pathway for ...
Observation Protocol for Active Learning (OPAL) - Washington University in St. Louis
The Observation Protocol for Active Learning (OPAL) can be used to collect research data, and also to consult and collaborate with STEM faculty to provide feedback on, and support for, their teaching innovations. ...
SET+
Student experience surveys are being insufficient to determine excellence in teaching was codified in collective bargaining agreement. Departments are developing and testing strategies that are appropriate for their context to include other forms of evaluation of teaching. CETL support through consultations, calibration of observers, customized departmental workshops and online training modules.The connection of holistic teaching evaluation and equity is emphasized.
Student Course Survey Items, University of Arizona
In 2019, a working group of faculty members revised end-of-course survey questions based on research around best practices.
University of Colorado Boulder/ University of Kansas/University of Massachusetts at Amherst Partnership Teaching Evaluation Rubric
University of Kansas, University of Colorado Boulder, and University of Massachusetts at Amherst will implement an evaluation framework to develop and use a teaching evaluation rubric. The process of transformation ...
UCLA Symposium: Exploring Practical Ways to Inspire and Reward Teaching Effectiveness and Instructional Innovation
Campus-wide workshop being hosted on June 12, 2018
Peer Review of Teaching Protocol, University of Arizona
Documentation for promotion and tenure requires a teaching portfolio and peer review evaluations. In response, the OIA developed an interactive, online protocol that can be used for peer review of teaching.
University of Massachusetts Amherst/TEval
UMass Amherst is the lead institution on a 5-university grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF) on the subject of changing the evaluation of teaching and studying that change process: "Transforming ...