Teaching Evaluation Change Initiatives in Higher Education
Submit a Teaching Evaluation Change Initiative »
Audience
- College/university staff 15 matches
- Teaching center staff 17 matches
- Departmental leaders 17 matches
- Graduate students & postdoctoral fellows 9 matches
- Undergraduate students 5 matches
- Student leaders 5 matches
- Change leaders 12 matches
- Faculty with long-term appointments 16 matches Tenure track, non-tenure track
- Faculty with short-term appointments 14 matches Non-tenure track, part-time, adjunct
- Institution administration 16 matches
- Institutional awards committees 7 matches
- Researchers 8 matches
Level of Intervention
Primary Teaching and Learing Context
Framework Emphasis
Tools/Materials for Evaluation
Processes for Revising Teaching Evaluation
Research-Based Pedagogies
Institution Type
- Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) 3 matches
- Historically Black College or University (HBCU) 1 match
- Tribal College or University (TCU) 1 match
- Minority Serving Institution (MSI) 1 match
- R1 14 matches
- R2 3 matches
- Public 10 matches
- Private 5 matches
- 2-year 3 matches
- 4-year 4 matches
- Masters comprehensive 2 matches
- T1 (scholarly teaching-focused institution) 3 matches
- Commuter 2 matches
Scale of Change
Resource Type
Results 1 - 10 of 17 matches
Observation Protocol for Active Learning (OPAL) - Washington University in St. Louis
The Observation Protocol for Active Learning (OPAL) can be used to collect research data, and also to consult and collaborate with STEM faculty to provide feedback on, and support for, their teaching innovations. ...
The Teaching Quality Framework Initiative
The Teaching Quality Framework Initiative (TQF) facilitates departmental and campus-wide efforts to provide a richer evaluation of teaching. Through enhanced evaluations, we promote and value high quality teaching, align resources, and reward scholarly approaches to improving student learning.
SET+
Student experience surveys are being insufficient to determine excellence in teaching was codified in collective bargaining agreement. Departments are developing and testing strategies that are appropriate for their context to include other forms of evaluation of teaching. CETL support through consultations, calibration of observers, customized departmental workshops and online training modules.The connection of holistic teaching evaluation and equity is emphasized.
University of Michigan/Center for Research on Learning and Teaching (CRLT)/Evaluation of Teaching
CRLT provides extensive information resources about ways to assess teaching effectiveness beyond student ratings, and provides consulting services to faculty and to Chairs and faculty committees.
The Career Framework for University Teaching
The Career Framework for University Teaching is designed to guide and support the career progression of academics on the basis of their contribution to teaching and learning. Offering both a structured pathway for ...
Boise State University/Framework for Assessing Teaching Effectiveness (FATE)
The Framework for Assessing Teaching Effectiveness, or FATE initiative at Boise State seeks to develop an inclusive framework and rubric to formatively and summatively assess teaching. The rubric is intended to be ...
University of Kansas/Center for Teaching Excellence/TEval
University of Kansas's (KU's) Center for Teaching Excellence (CTE) has designed a multidimentional rubric, professional development sequences, and other informational resources that departments can adapt ...
University of Massachusetts Amherst/TEval
UMass Amherst is the lead institution on a 5-university grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF) on the subject of changing the evaluation of teaching and studying that change process: "Transforming ...
University of Maine/University of British Columbia/COPUS
To collect information about the nature of STEM teaching practices as a means to support institutional change, faculty at both the University of British Columbia (UBC) and the University of Maine (UMaine) reviewed ...
Excellence in Teaching Initiative
Peer review will be based on classroom observation, and review of course materials, course design and assignments. Peer evaluators also will consider teaching reflection statements and inclusive practices.