Curated Teaching Evaluation Initiative Repository
Submit a Teaching Evaluation Change Initiative » Submit Feedback About the Repository »
The Teaching Evaluation Change Initiatives repository serves as a searchable collection of teaching evaluations, which are assessed on how well they are aligned with systemic change. Teaching initiatives are reviewed regularly by the Repository Editorial Board. For more information on the editorial process, refer to the Teaching Evaluation Change Initiatives Guide.
Audience
- College/university staff 10 matches
- Teaching center staff 10 matches
- Departmental leaders 10 matches
- Graduate students & postdoctoral fellows 7 matches
- Undergraduate students 2 matches
- Student leaders 2 matches
- Change leaders 6 matches
- Faculty with long-term appointments 9 matches Tenure track, non-tenure track
- Faculty with short-term appointments 9 matches Non-tenure track, part-time, adjunct
- Institution administration 9 matches
- Institutional awards committees 2 matches
- Researchers 3 matches
Level of Intervention Show all
Teaching center
10 matchesPrimary Teaching and Learing Context
Framework Emphasis
Tools/Materials for Evaluation
Processes for Revising Teaching Evaluation
Research-Based Pedagogies
Institution Type
Scale of Change
Resource Type
Results 1 - 10 of 10 matches
University of Michigan/Center for Research on Learning and Teaching (CRLT)/Evaluation of Teaching
CRLT provides extensive information resources about ways to assess teaching effectiveness beyond student ratings, and provides consulting services to faculty and to Chairs and faculty committees.
Teaching Effectiveness Framework (TEF) Toolkit
The Teaching Effectiveness Framework (TEF) Toolkit developed by the Institute for Learning and Teaching (TILT) at Colorado State University is grounded in the scholarship of teaching and learning. The toolkit ...
Essential Competencies of a Valencia Educator - Valencia College
The Valencia College Teaching/Learning Academy (TLA), a community of practice, supports new professors, counselors, and librarians as they develop Individualized Learning Plans, a fundamental phase of the tenure ...
University of Massachusetts Amherst/TEval
UMass Amherst is the lead institution on a 5-university grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF) on the subject of changing the evaluation of teaching and studying that change process: "Transforming ...
University of Kansas/Center for Teaching Excellence/TEval
University of Kansas's (KU's) Center for Teaching Excellence (CTE) has designed a multidimentional rubric, professional development sequences, and other informational resources that departments can adapt ...
Center for Teaching Innovation (CTI) - Cornell University
CTI provides information and resources for faculty members to document their teaching and provides consultations to departments/colleges using peer review of teaching as part of promotion and/or tenure review. ...
Approaches to Evaluation of Teaching (formerly SET+)
Student experience surveys are being insufficient to determine excellence in teaching was codified in collective bargaining agreement. Departments are developing and testing strategies that are appropriate for their context to include other forms of evaluation of teaching. CETL support through consultations, calibration of observers, customized departmental workshops and online training modules.The connection of holistic teaching evaluation and equity is emphasized.
Boise State University/Framework for Assessing Teaching Effectiveness (FATE)
The Framework for Assessing Teaching Effectiveness, or FATE initiative at Boise State seeks to develop an inclusive framework and rubric to formatively and summatively assess teaching. The rubric is intended to be ...
Observation Protocol for Active Learning (OPAL) - Washington University in St. Louis
The Observation Protocol for Active Learning (OPAL) can be used to collect research data, and also to consult and collaborate with STEM faculty to provide feedback on, and support for, their teaching innovations. ...
USC Excellence in Teaching Initiative
Peer review will be based on classroom observation, and review of course materials, course design and assignments. Peer evaluators also will consider teaching reflection statements and inclusive practices.