Teaching Eval Shake-Up
A resource page from the Accelerating Systemic Change Network discussing institutional shifts in faculty evaluation, highlighting the University of Southern California and University of Oregon's move to discontinue student evaluations in tenure and promotion decisions. auto-generated The author of this page didn't provide a brief description so this one sentence summary was created by an AI tool. It may not be completely accurate.

Refining the Paradigm: Holistic Evaluation of Faculty to Support Faculty and Student Learning
A resource page from the Accelerating Systemic Change Network presents a holistic faculty evaluation framework emphasizing integrated assessment of teaching, scholarship, service, and professional development to support systemic reform in STEM higher education. auto-generated The author of this page didn't provide a brief description so this one sentence summary was created by an AI tool. It may not be completely accurate.

The Future of Undergraduate Education: The Future of America
A resource page from the Accelerating Systemic Change Network discussing a national strategy report on undergraduate education reform, emphasizing student success, policy, faculty evaluation, and systemic change in 21st-century higher education. auto-generated The author of this page didn't provide a brief description so this one sentence summary was created by an AI tool. It may not be completely accurate.

Does teaching advance your academic career?
A resource page from the Accelerating Systemic Change Network that examines how teaching impacts academic career advancement, featuring a table of evidence for promotion cases based on teaching achievement, drawn from a Royal Academy of Engineering report on evaluating teaching in higher education tenure and promotion decisions. auto-generated The author of this page didn't provide a brief description so this one sentence summary was created by an AI tool. It may not be completely accurate.

Progress Toward Achieving Systemic Change: A Five-Year Status Report on the AAU Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative
A report page presenting a five-year status assessment of the AAU Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative, covering systemic change progress through instructor surveys, departmental policy analyses, and learning space evaluations, with emphasis on faculty evaluation, non-tenure track roles, and institutional reform. auto-generated The author of this page didn't provide a brief description so this one sentence summary was created by an AI tool. It may not be completely accurate.

A Better Way to Evaluate Undergraduate Teaching
A journal article page proposing an improved method for evaluating undergraduate teaching at research universities using the Teaching Practices Inventory, emphasizing assessment, faculty evaluation, and systemic change in STEM education. auto-generated The author of this page didn't provide a brief description so this one sentence summary was created by an AI tool. It may not be completely accurate.

Matrix of institutional policy and practice innovations
A resource page from the Accelerating Systemic Change Network presents a matrix mapping institutional policies and practices that evaluate and reward teaching, scholarship, and service across higher education, particularly within STEM disciplines, developed by Emily Miller and Christine Broussard. auto-generated The author of this page didn't provide a brief description so this one sentence summary was created by an AI tool. It may not be completely accurate.

Yale University/Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL)
Contact: Jennifer Frederick; Yale University, jennifer.frederick@yale.edu
The CTL provides information about sources of feedback instructors can use to inform their teaching and also provides consulting services to faculty. Many sources of feedback are available to instructors to inform their teaching, including: self-reflection, students' mid-semester feedback, peer review of teaching, and end-of-term evaluations. Instructors should feel empowered to determine what methods fit the needs and context of their situation and to try out different approaches over time.

Three levels of chemistry educational research
This editorial page presents a typology of chemistry educational research, categorizing journal submissions into three levels based on their focus on chemistry-specific teaching and learning, and serves as a resource within the Accelerating Systemic Change Network for STEM education reform. auto-generated The author of this page didn't provide a brief description so this one sentence summary was created by an AI tool. It may not be completely accurate.

Catalyzing Institutional Transformation: Insights from the AAU STEM Initiative
A journal article page detailing the AAU Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative’s strategies for institutional transformation, including its network-building approach, outcomes, and recommendations for systemic reform in undergraduate STEM education, faculty evaluation, and alignment of academic work with change efforts. auto-generated The author of this page didn't provide a brief description so this one sentence summary was created by an AI tool. It may not be completely accurate.