Follow Up Survey on Indicators for Monitoring Undergraduate STEM Education Feedback

This past year we asked ASCN members to fill out a survey based on this report to determine which of these indicators they need to measure, which have existing measurement tools (and what those are), and which need measurement tools to be developed. Out of the eleven objectives described in the report, the results of our survey suggest three areas for which there is a critical need for the development of assessment tools and an additional five where tools exist but there is a strong need for improved means of measurement. These results are summarized in this document: WG4 Survey Summary of Findings (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 20kB Jan22 19).

Please answer the questions below to provide feedback.

Questions for FeedbackWithin the framework established by the NAS report, are these the right priorities for the development of assessment tools?


What is the right target audience both to identify useful tools for measuring these indicators and to help determine priorities for the development of new or better instruments?


Has the NAS report identified the right questions to be asked of undergraduate STEM programs? What is missing?

Contact InformationProviding contact information is not required. If you wish to keep your responses anonymous simply skip this portion of the survey.

First Name

Last Name

Institution

Department

Position Title

Email

Name Email