Course-embedded Undergraduate Research Experiences: A 4-year CURE curriculum model for closing the performance gap in under-prepared and under-represented groups in STEM fields.

Thursday 12:40 pm – 1:05 pm PT / 1:40 pm – 2:05 pm MT / 2:40 pm – 3:05 pm CT / 3:40 pm – 4:05 pm ET Online

Clay Runck, Georgia Gwinnett College
Judy Awong-Taylor, Georgia Gwinnett College
Allison D'Costa, Georgia Gwinnett College
Tirza Leader, Georgia Gwinnett College
Cindy Achat-Mendes, Georgia Gwinnett College
Chantelle Anfuso, Georgia Gwinnett College
David Pursell, Georgia Gwinnett College
MOHAMED JAMALOODEEN, Georgia Gwinnett College
Joshua Edwards, Georgia Gwinnett College

The School of Science and Technology at Georgia Gwinnett College has incorporated Course-embedded Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) for 9 years as part of a comprehensive systems approach model to transform STEM learning, student engagement, and inclusivity for our student population. Central to our model is the growing body of evidence that shows a link between student research, lasting learning, and students' interest in careers in STEM. An internal mini-grant program was used to incentivize faculty to redesign courses to incorporate CUREs to help students develop STEM skills and competencies. Unlike traditional apprentice-style research that is highly selective, CUREs increase inclusivity because they offer research experiences to all students enrolled in the course irrespective of their background and skills. Our CURE model incorporates multiple CUREs throughout all four years of matriculation for all STEM majors and provides a mechanism for successfully engaging large numbers of students in undergraduate research and provide them with the skills and confidence to seek out independent, faculty-mentored research or alternative summer research opportunities. Results from an on-going, in-depth study that currently includes 5 semesters of quantitative and qualitative assessment data on the impact of CUREs on student success and engagement, including impact on ethnicity, gender, course grades, and student attitudes show:

  1. CUREs have led to a more positive belief in self-efficacy in communication, experimental design, career choices, and critical thinking/problem solving;
  2. overall, CUREs no significant effect of on course grade;
  3. African American students performed significantly better in CURE sections than controls;
  4. African American students performed significantly better in MATH CUREs than controls;
  5. CUREs are inclusive and allow for repeated exposures to STEM skills.

Our current data suggest that CUREs, a High Impact Practice, may be helping to close the performance gap in under-prepared and under-represented groups in STEM fields.

Presentation Media

Barcoding CURE (Acrobat (PDF) 359kB Jun9 21)

Presentation Media

Institutional model article (Acrobat (PDF) PRIVATE FILE 1.6MB Jun8 21)

Presentation Media

audio lightening talk (M4A Audio 4.2MB Jun7 21)
4-year CURE model (Acrobat (PDF) 996kB Jun7 21)

Runck et al. poster file (Acrobat (PDF) 6MB Jun7 21)
Runck et al. CURE poster audio transcript (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 18kB Jun7 21)

 




Course-embedded Undergraduate Research Experiences: A 4-year CURE curriculum model for closing the performance gap in under-prepared and under-represented groups in STEM fields. -- Discussion  

Have any praise, comments, questions, concerns, or critiques for this poster? Leave a note to begin the discussion. You can reply to this post or create a new thread below.

14701:46389

Share edittextuser=332683 post_id=46389 initial_post_id=0 thread_id=14701

Join the Discussion


Log in to reply