Enacting Department-Level Changes: Faculty Evaluations, Curriculum Reviews, and Self-Study Guidelines

Wednesday 12:40 pm – 1:05 pm PT / 1:40 pm – 2:05 pm MT / 2:40 pm – 3:05 pm CT / 3:40 pm – 4:05 pm ET Online

Lorraine Cordeiro, University of Massachusetts-Amherst
Claire Norton, University of Massachusetts-Amherst
Heather Wemhoener, University of Massachusetts-Amherst
Elena Carbone, University of Massachusetts-Amherst

The Department of Nutrition at UMass Amherst launched several initiatives to improve our approach to faculty teaching evaluations. Traditionally, standardized student course and instructor evaluations (SRTI) formed the basis of faculty teaching evaluations at UMass with limited personnel committee understanding on how to effectively use SRTIs in the assessment process. The first initiative involved piloting peer faculty reviews for three faculty going up for promotion. Faculty could opt to include these peer reviews in their dossiers for personnel action. For this pilot, two TEval team members drafted review criteria. These were presented to faculty for feedback. Peers then observed the faculty being reviewed and assessed them according to the criteria that had been developed. Faculty involved in this process felt that it was so helpful that it was recommended that all faculty should review and be reviewed in the future. The second initiative involved a comprehensive review of all in-person courses. A parallel review of online courses is currently underway. Preliminary results indicate gaps in meeting required university components, course objectives, and diversity statements. This information will be used to guide faculty in improving their syllabi and increasing accessibility to students. The third initiative was to develop a department Self-Study to understand historical trends, systemic concerns, and propose revisions to the department's strategic plan and By-Laws. A draft of the self-study protocol was completed and shared with faculty and with university-wide ADVANCE fellows. The department will finalize the self-study and begin to collect data in the coming year.

Presentation Media

dept_nutrition_poster_final_june_2021.pptx.pptx (PowerPoint 2007 (.pptx) 547kB Jun7 21)

dept_nutrition_poster_final_june_2021_recorded.pptm ( 36.7MB Jun7 21)




Enacting Department-Level Changes: Faculty Evaluations, Curriculum Reviews, and Self-Study Guidelines -- Discussion  

Have any praise, comments, questions, concerns, or critiques for this poster? Leave a note to begin the discussion. You can reply to this post or create a new thread below.

14684:46372

Share edittextuser=332683 post_id=46372 initial_post_id=0 thread_id=14684

This post was edited by Jean Hertzberg on Jun, 2021

14684:46458

Share edittextuser=337356 post_id=46458 initial_post_id=0 thread_id=14684

The syllabi data are very interesting. We are given a lot of boilerplate from our campus on disability and religious accommodations, and professional conduct expectations. I wonder if our compliance rates are different from yours.

Question: what 'structural barriers' have you been able to identify?

14684:46459

Share edittextuser=337356 post_id=46459 initial_post_id=0 thread_id=14684

Join the Discussion


Log in to reply